It’s not just in the food. |

Clean living for your whole home

It’s not just the food.
It’s everything.

From the kitchen to the crib, ingredients worth knowing hide in what your family touches every day.Nalee explains the available product records and their sources, one scan at a time.

Example analysis

From catalog data. Check the current report in Nalee.

Kid ZBar, Chocolate Chip
Clif

Kid ZBar, Chocolate Chip

64out of 100
Some Concerns
How we scorei
Get Nalee

Search or scan supported products for source-backed analysis.Free to start, no card required.

Analyzed across the aisles you already shop

Whole FoodsCostcoSam’s ClubTrader Joe’sTargetWalmartKrogerPublixSproutsAldiLidlH MartWegmansWhole FoodsCostcoSam’s ClubTrader Joe’sTargetWalmartKrogerPublixSproutsAldiLidlH MartWegmans
SafewayGiant EagleStop & ShopCVSWalgreensDollar TreeWawa7-ElevenSheetzRoyal FarmsErewhonThrive MarketAmazonSafewayGiant EagleStop & ShopCVSWalgreensDollar TreeWawa7-ElevenSheetzRoyal FarmsErewhonThrive MarketAmazon
2.5M+real products in the library, and still growing
16+categories, food to furniture to pets
16free, public sources and authorities
$1.99a month, more coverage, less money
Total coverage

If it has a barcode, we’ll take a read on it.

From the conglomerates behind most of the grocery store to store brands and the convenience aisle.Nalee pulls the available facts and scores a product when the source evidence is sufficient; otherwise it says the analysis is unavailable.

NestléPepsiCoProcter & GambleUnileverCoca-ColaMarsMondelēzKraft HeinzGeneral MillsDanoneKellanova
Tyson FoodsConagraCampbell’sHersheyJ.M. SmuckerColgate-PalmoliveCloroxReckittChurch & DwightL’OréalKenvue
Where every score comes from

A global data powerhouse behind one honest number.

Nalee brings together public science, government records, open catalogs and manufacturer labels.The source and strength of the evidence matter as much as the score.

Scoring engine v83 · deterministic, no AI in the scoring path
FDA logo
FDA
EPA logo
EPA
NIH logo
NIH
EU / ECHA logo
EU / ECHA
USDA logo
USDA
WHO / IARC logo
WHO / IARC
CPSC logo
CPSC
Open Food Facts logo
Open Food Facts
OBF
Open Beauty Facts
PubChem logo
PubChem
EWG logo
EWG
DSLD
NIH DSLD
P65
OEHHA · Prop 65
ATSDR logo
ATSDR
NSF / WQA logo
NSF / WQA
NS
Nutri-Score

From the FDA, EPA, NIH, USDA and CPSC in the United States, to ECHA and the EU chemical registries, to the WHO’s cancer agency and the global Open Facts databases. Scoring explanations link to supporting sources. Coverage, review status and freshness vary; an entry is not a guarantee of independent testing.

16
public data sources and authorities worldwide
Source-backed
available source records and citations, with gaps identified
2.5M+
catalog records; evidence depth varies by product
0
paid score changes or advertising placements
How it works

One scan. One honest answer.

01

Scan a product

Point your camera at a barcode — or snap the ingredient list itself: a snack, a serum, a sofa, a onesie.

Barcode, label photo, or type it
Read on your device
Supported categories
02

Get one honest score

A score out of 100 when the available evidence is sufficient, with the reasons in plain English.

Out of 100
Per-category rubric
Source-linked reasons
03

Choose better

Understand the available ingredients and concerns, then explore comparable alternatives.

Cleaner swaps
What to avoid
Recall alerts
What you can explore

One place for everyday decisions.

Find the available evidence across your home.Coverage varies by category and product; Nalee shows when there is not enough information to score.

Food & supplements

Ingredients, nutrition and relevant source records. Missing panels stay missing.

Beauty & personal care

Ingredient concerns explained with citations. A score is not a clinical safety test.

Home, clothing & more

Category-specific checks for materials, claims and documented concerns.

Recalls & nearby places

Official recall notices and source-listed places. Confirm the exact product or venue details.

Curiosity, with context

Good questions deserve careful answers.

Research helps us ask better questions about everyday products.A chemical detection, a population trend and a proven health effect are different kinds of evidence.Nalee keeps that context close to the source.

Explore the NIEHS microplastics discussion ↗
Our independence

The score is the product.And nothing about it is for sale.

Nalee applies its own scoring rules to available source records and published research.Brands cannot pay to change a score.Missing evidence stays visible, and your data is not sold.

No ads or affiliate links
No brand partnerships
No brand can buy a score
No invented lab measurements
Open data you can re-check
Your data is never sold
The Findings

The science behind what we flag.

Studies, investigations and regulatory notices, with their limits kept in view.Read the original source for the full context.

Nature Medicine

Microplastics measured in brain tissue

A study of postmortem tissue detected plastic particles in the brain, liver, and kidneys. The health consequences need further research.

Read the source →
UC Berkeley

What a tampon study can—and can’t—tell us

Researchers measured metals in 30 tampons from 14 brands. How much is released or absorbed during use remains uncertain.

Read the source →
Center for Environmental Health

Why BPS in receipts prompted warning claims

CEH reported that brief contact with tested receipts could exceed California’s Proposition 65 warning threshold. This is a warning requirement, not a universal safe-versus-unsafe cutoff.

Read the source →
CDC

CDC tracked 566 applesauce-linked lead cases

The 2023–2024 investigation identified 566 cases across all ages, including 542 children under six, after consumption of cinnamon-containing applesauce.

Read the source →
Columbia

Plastic particles measured in bottled water

In samples from three brands, researchers measured about 240,000 plastic particles per liter on average. About 90% were nanoplastics; the study did not establish health effects.

Read the source →
FDA

FDA sets Red No. 3 phase-out dates

Food makers have until January 15, 2027, and ingested-drug makers until January 18, 2028. The legal revocation follows male-rat cancer findings; FDA says that mechanism does not occur in humans.

Read the source →
Notre Dame

What a cosmetics study found about PFAS

High fluorine, an indicator of possible PFAS use, appeared in 47% of mascaras tested. Follow-up testing found specific PFAS in 29 selected cosmetics.

Read the source →

Each card links to its named source. Images are editorial illustrations, not the products or samples tested.

Nalee Inner Circle

Go all the way in.

Start with the free tier.Inner Circle adds unlimited scans, deeper ingredient details, available swaps and recall watch.

Free
$0forever

Everything you need to start scanning a cleaner home.

Scan supported products for an honest Nalee Score10 scans a weekSearch the full 2.5M+ product libraryEvery score shows its reasons and sourcesFDA & CPSC recall alertsThe Feed: Voices, The Findings and booksSource-listed places near you
Get the app, free
Inner CircleMOST POPULAR
$1.99/ month
or $19.99 / yearSAVE 16%

Everything in Free, plus:

Unlimited scansThe full ingredient storyCleaner swapsRecall watchYour FlagsThe Anti-Inflammatory Cookbook
Join Inner Circle

Member-funded · No ads, ever · Cancel anytime

Less than a single coffee a month, for your whole family’s peace of mind.

Nalee

Know what’s in it.

Start your family’s clean living journey with one scan.